How does ekoIntelligence differ from traditional ESG rating systems?
Our platform was built for investors, regulators, consumers, and companies who seek the truth about corporate sustainability. Whether it’s detecting greenwashing, identifying systemic risks, or pushing for genuine change, ekoIntelligence empowers stakeholders with the data-driven insights they need to drive meaningful action.
By leveraging AI, historical data, and predictive analytics, EkoIntelligence exposes discrepancies between what companies claim and what they actually do. This ensures that businesses are held accountable for both their past actions and their future commitments.
How does ekoIntelligence differ from traditional ESG rating systems?
Traditional ESG rating systems—and more broadly initiatives like Net Zero and COP—rely on narrow metrics that fail to adequately capture ecological & social impact.
Although modern frameworks (e.g., SASB and GRI) have started incorporating narrative disclosures and contextual analyses, they still reduce complex issues too simplistic "current" KPIs - overlooking historical harm, and credibility of "stated intents".
This opens the door to industrial scales of greenwashing, where companies manipulate narratives and metrics (through accounting tweaks or off-setting tactics) while continuing to ignore real world ecological and societal externalities. ekoIntelligence redefines ESG.
By integrating historical harm assessments; by analysing causal relationships; by assessing an organisation's behaviour—ekoIntelligence exposes discrepancies between public claims and actual behaviour.
Our approach — provides a more comprehensive, transparent and actionable picture of a company’s true environmental, social, and governance historical impact & future intent.
So are ESG metrics are no longer required?
Current ESG metric based approaches only reflect current "performance" of selected KPIs and miss the historical harm and causal factors that drive a company’s real-world impact.
Without integrating these deeper insights, ESG metrics alone risk masking underlying issues and even aid greenwashing.
In essence, while ESG metrics are useful, they must be augmented with historical context and causal analysis to truly reflect a company’s environmental, social, and governance legacy, and future trajectory.
ekoIntelligence vs Traditional ESG Metrics
How does ekoIntelligence differ from traditional ESG rating systems?
Our platform was built for investors, regulators, consumers, and companies who seek the truth about corporate sustainability. Whether it’s detecting greenwashing, identifying systemic risks, or pushing for genuine change, ekoIntelligence empowers stakeholders with the data-driven insights they need to drive meaningful action.
By leveraging AI, historical data, and predictive analytics, EkoIntelligence exposes discrepancies between what companies claim and what they actually do. This ensures that businesses are held accountable for both their past actions and their future commitments.
How does ekoIntelligence differ from traditional ESG rating systems?
Traditional ESG rating systems—and more broadly initiatives like Net Zero and COP—rely on narrow metrics that fail to adequately capture ecological & social impact.
Although modern frameworks (e.g., SASB and GRI) have started incorporating narrative disclosures and contextual analyses, they still reduce complex issues too simplistic "current" KPIs - overlooking historical harm, and credibility of "stated intents".
This opens the door to industrial scales of greenwashing, where companies manipulate narratives and metrics (through accounting tweaks or off-setting tactics) while continuing to ignore real world ecological and societal externalities. ekoIntelligence redefines ESG.
By integrating historical harm assessments; by analysing causal relationships; by assessing an organisation's behaviour—ekoIntelligence exposes discrepancies between public claims and actual behaviour.
Our approach — provides a more comprehensive, transparent and actionable picture of a company’s true environmental, social, and governance historical impact & future intent.
So are ESG metrics are no longer required?
Current ESG metric based approaches only reflect current "performance" of selected KPIs and miss the historical harm and causal factors that drive a company’s real-world impact.
Without integrating these deeper insights, ESG metrics alone risk masking underlying issues and even aid greenwashing.
In essence, while ESG metrics are useful, they must be augmented with historical context and causal analysis to truly reflect a company’s environmental, social, and governance legacy, and future trajectory.